Community Voices Of Opposition


Below are other voices and essays speaking out against the ruinous Downtown Utica hospital concept. You may also be interested in #NHD RADIO and #NHD TV. As well as still more comments against the downtown concept


Voices of 2018

May 22, 2018 - Originally from the Utica Phoenix and now posted here, What makes Utica So Special? Writer says, "These aspects are so fragile and can be so easily destroyed – PLEASE be careful with this major issue of the location of the new hospital."

May 20, 2018 - Read an Open Letter From Pete Benson. Peter is now submitted his letter to media outlets throughout the Mohawk Valley.

Wish to send your letter to the media, see our Resources page, please copy us at Editor.




May 9, 2018 - "Open Letter to Mr. Scholefield"
Mr. Scholefield, you said, “ . . . with the primary mission of delivering state-of-the-art healthcare to our region . . . .” Continue Reading
By Joseph P Bottini






Sharpe, as in Larry Sharpe For New York Governor

Learn More: Larry Sharpe for Governor of New York 2018



April 20, 2018 - One Hospital = Economic Development Fail

Cassandra Harris-Lockwood - The March edition of the Utica Phoenix carried a story entitled “A History of Hospitals in Utica” It explained in a very historically accurate manner, the development of Utica’s hospitals.

It was recently explained to me by a longtime businessman about how St. Luke’s was built, back in the day. This friend is quite successful as his family has been for several generations. Sometimes it takes an on the ground historical perspective to really get a handle on what’s going on... Read More


April 16, 2018 - Dear Editor: Enough is enough. The only reason MVHS wants the new hospital downtown is so they could reap the financial windfall of commercially developing their 64 acres at St. Luke’s. If a new hospital would result in fantastic commercial growth in the area it’s built, has anyone wondered why New Hartford has stood by, so gleefully silent, as the downtown Utica plan has stumbled forward?

Utica is simply being used as a dumping ground for this tax-exempt elephant. Both Mayor Palmieri and First Ward Councilperson Maria McNiel know this and should be run out of town for not having enough integrity to stand up against those behind the downtown hospital scam.

The cost of maintaining the infrastructure needed for this elephant, year after year, will be coupled with the tax losses of the buildings and businesses they propose to expel and destroy, in the end, bankrupt this city.

MVHS owns 64 acres at St Luke’s. Is anyone really gullible enough to believe that their desire to build downtown is some grand philanthropic gesture towards Utica? Give me a frickin’ break!

It’s to stick us with a tax-exempt elephant while their St. Luke’s land ultimately becomes available for lucrative commercial development. Uticans need to step up the pressure on their elected officials to stop this scam immediately.

Ray Jadwick, Utica Custom T-Shirts


April 16, 2018 - Dear, Editor: “What difference would it make, really?”

Have you ever been asked a question that left you speechless for a moment? Recently, I was having a conversation about our recent “Heart Bombing- Love A Landmark” event and the historic buildings that we would lose if the new hospital was built downtown. I was a little surprised by that question so I tried to put a few things out there as food for thought.

As both a Landmarks member and a concerned taxpayer, I explained that there would be a number of differences if the hospital was built at the St. Luke’s campus. Many historic buildings would get an opportunity to be adaptively reused- just like many of the buildings in Bagg’s Square. Sadly, we have lost too many already to failed urban renewal projects. And the hospital will not add anything to the rebirth of our historic downtown. Also, think of all the owners who would not be forced, needlessly, to abandon their property and livelihood. How devastating do you think that will be to those folks? That reason alone should give everyone else-reason to pause and think differently about this downtown plan.

I kept the conversation going (although, I was the only one talking at this point) with the fact that using the shovel-ready acreage that the hospital already owns would eliminate the need to displace anyone. And the property was acquired way back when for expansion purposes.Originally Champlin Ave. and French Rd. were widened to handle more traffic- traffic that would be a result of an expansion project-or a new hospital.

Lastly, I asked how much money could be saved if the Mohawk Valley Health System did not have to purchase unneeded land, pay court fees from the pending litigation from the current property owners, demolish existing structures and prepare the work site because it is not shovel-ready?

Also, don’t forget that you and every other city and county taxpayer will be paying on the parking garage that needs to be squeezed in there for decades. And any architect or engineer will tell you that parking garages in the Northeast have a limited lifespan compared to the ones built in fairer climates. So when your finally done paying for it, you will then be asked to fund the repair or renovation of it. Or possibly even the replacement of it, depending on if the funds were there to maintain it in the first place.

Overall, the downtown hospital will be a very, very costly undertaking compared to doing the same thing at the current site of St. Luke’s Hospital.

In the end, I was very pleased to hear, “I did not realize so many factors were in play. There is a big difference when you compare the two sites”. Yes, there is and I can only hope more and more folks are starting to see the difference as well.

Steven Grant, President, Landmarks Society


April 16, 2018 - Dear Editor: Enough is enough. The only reason MVHS wants the new hospital downtown is so they could reap the financial windfall of commercially developing their 64 acres at St. Luke’s.

If a new hospital would result in fantastic commercial growth in the area it’s built, has anyone wondered why New Hartford has stood by, so gleefully silent, as the downtown Utica plan has stumbled forward?

Utica is simply being used as a dumping ground for this tax-exempt elephant. Both Mayor Palmieri and First Ward Councilperson Maria McNiel know this and should be run out of town for not having enough integrity to stand up against those behind the downtown hospital scam.

The cost of maintaining the infrastructure needed for this elephant, year after year, will be coupled with the tax losses of the buildings and businesses they propose to expel and destroy, in the end, bankrupt this city.

MVHS owns 64 acres at St Luke’s. Is anyone really gullible enough to believe that their desire to build downtown is some grand philanthropic gesture towards Utica? Give me a frickin’ break!

It’s to stick us with a tax-exempt elephant while their St. Luke’s land ultimately becomes available for lucrative commercial development. Uticans need to step up the pressure on their elected officials to stop this scam immediately.

Ray Jadwick, Utica Custom T-Shirts


April 14, 2018 - Downtown not right place to build hospital

Why would you want to put a hospital downtown Utica near an event center, a proposed casino and in close proximity to a major railway? Could one feel safe in such an area?

What about traffic and parking at peak hours between venues? Health care is changing, doctors are now opening their own surgical centers, the new hospital will do little to change anything other than streamlining MVHS struggling operations resulting in even fewer jobs!

People will still go to Syracuse, Albany or Rochester. The politicians argue it will spur economic development but just look at Rome when they sacrificed their downtown to build Fort Stanwix, did things get better? No, fact is a few prospered and the rest was left for the memory. There are fewer shops, fewer restaurants, less office space, etc..

Decades later what has been Rome been doing? Re-opening streets, building more office space, tearing down parking garages and trying to attract more businesses to its downtown area. So in the grand scheme of things what will Utica gain?

If past area history is an indicator it will be fewer tax dollars, fewer jobs and businesses just the same old Utica and the same old people with a select few prospering!

Doug Singleton, Westmoreland


April 14, 2018 - Shopping center could be best for hospital

Recently the leasing manager and trustee for the New Hartford Shopping Center, William C. Morris, sent a letter to the Utica City Planning Board in regard to an opportunity for the new hospital to be built at the shopping center site. He outlined the fact that the site is accessible to major roads and highways and sits in the area deemed to be located within the largest county population.

Furthermore, there are no parking obstacles that will cost taxpayers upwards of $60-70 million. Morris hit the nail on the head, suggesting that the hospital lease the land in an effort to provide and maintain a stream of tax revenue for the services that are vital to our community.

This is a win-win for everyone. Uticans cannot and will not foot the bill for building parking garages and surface lots. The disruption to the current businesses downtown will inevitably kill off their business and drive them out of the city, hurting taxpayers even more. Utica’s tax base has already diminished and services are dwindling to cover administrative and public safety costs. Adding more taxes to the current tax bill will only drive more people out of the city.

Building at the shopping center will have little to no negative impact on any of our local municipalities. The main objective when building the hospital should not just be the services it will provide but making sure it’s financial feasible for the taxpayers.

David J. Gordon, Utica


April 12, 2018 - Dear Editor: I have read that hospital administration and government officials have indicated that a move downtown would create social and residential vibrancy and economic vitality to the neighborhood. I respectfully disagree with that notion. As a resident of the city of Utica with possible interest in a downtown move, having a sprawling hospital campus would detract from a vibrant downtown feel and would be excessively noisy and congested, particularly given that Utica’s downtown is so small.

The successful revitalization of areas like Bagg’s Square, Franklin Square, and Bank Place – by entrepreneurs – is more consistent with my definition of a vibrant city with a residential appeal (and some of the reasons I am thrilled to have chosen to move here). Could efforts not be made to spur economic development of this nature to the proposed site? Likewise, part of what makes Utica “cool” is its historic buildings. By razing them to build a hospital campus, the historic identity of Utica would be irrevocably stripped. Too many buildings in downtown have already suffered this fate over the years. Preservation is what makes a city appealing to its residents and visitors.

For evidence, I point to the Landmarc Building. The structure was saved from demolition and now serves as a mixed-use facility that illustrates the very notion of urban “cool” to which I referred above.

Further, I am concerned that removing both preexisting and prospective businesses in the proposed site would harm Utica’s existing and future tax base. Given my understanding that the hospital would claim tax-exempt status, this doesn’t seem to make sound, long-term economic sense.

I understand that $300 million in state funding for the hospital has been promised, provided that new buildings are erected. Given that the proposed move would exceed that amount by hundreds of millions of dollars, from where would the additional money be generated? Given MVHS’s annual operating losses in the millions of dollars, is there some other revenue stream that would not affect taxpayers?

Bear in mind that the annual median household income for Oneida County is significantly lower than the national average, and residents are financially unable to accommodate further tax burdens.

With regard to new construction, would the preexisting space available at the St. Luke’s campus not be more viable for a new or expanded facility? Would it not also provide more assurance with responsibility limiting the costs to the $300 million which has already been procured? Existing road infrastructure is there as well, and the site would not have to undergo the costly expense of relocation to an area that is not yet part of the MVHS land assets.

Additionally, the existing St. Luke’s campus would presumably have even more room to expand in the future, even beyond the immediate addition, unlike the landlocked downtown neighborhood.

I am grateful for the opportunity to articulate my concerns, albeit not in person at any forum. Access to quality, cost-effective healthcare is certainly part of what makes a city desirable. However, it seems this could be better achieved without moving the hospital downtown.

Sincerely, Halina Lotyczewski


April 12, 2018 - Dear Editor: I am not sure if this has ever been brought up but if you look at the major hospitals in Syracuse, you notice that St. Joe’s is located in a “not real bad” residential area with a few businesses not too far away.

On the other hand, Crouse, Upstate, and the VA hospitals are located in close proximity to one another such as Faxton, St. Luke’s, St. Es and Slocum Dixon and………amidst them, is Utica College whereas in Syracuse it’s SU amidst the major conglomerate of hospitals.

So we have a fine educational institution near a group of fine hospitals in Syracuse and our local politicians seem to be forcing us with, perhaps, a fine hospital near high traffic highways, railroad tracks, the Aud (which could be a traffic and noise problem), the transfer station on Leyland, perhaps a sports center as I have heard rumors about, and other similar such places. All of this is not to mention the inconvenience that this will cause for Utica College nursing students.

I don’t understand where their heads are at and I don’t understand why a FEW SELECTED PERSONS have decided this.

These local elected officials are basically “ramming” this down our throats, as is too often typical of politicians and “big shots”.

Everyone I have talked to is against a downtown hospital and, actually, everyone (again) has said ‘what’s wrong with building on the St. Luke’s property’?

I agree, and if it is not big enough, they could purchase a little surrounding property just like the city is planning on doing downtown.

The downtown location is a TERRIBLE idea and now they are even talking about privatizing the parking which means patrons will have to pay for parking – undoubtedly a very high fee.

This whole downtown concept has basically BEEN FORCED upon the citizens of this community. Once again, it’s a matter of what the politicians and/or the very wealthy want and the h… with the ordinary people.

I know for one, if I have a need for non-life threatening medical care, I will certainly consider going to Syracuse or somewhere where the facility I go to will be better.

Joseph R. Paxhia (Joe)


March 26, 2018 - A supporter sent-in a proposal to fly our message over the Utica skyline, so we got right on it...

Now that's a sight we can all say "Yes" to!!


March 23, 2018 - Dear #NoHospitalDowntown, As your members may be aware from your Facebook page, the OD recently published a rather unusual editorial comment regarding my March 8 letter to the editor concerning the decision to build the new hospital downtown rather than on the St. Luke's Campus. In that letter I expressed my preference for the St. Luke's site. Here, in relevant part, is what I said about the subject in my letter as published in the March 17 edition of the OD:

"We now learn that even after the new hospital opens, medical and other hospital related services will continue to be provided at St. Luke's and St. Elizabeth's, as well as at Faxton Hospital. Is it not a truly bizarre consolidation process that takes three existing facilities and transforms them into four? Three currently tax exempt properties become four under this 'plan'?"

One might think I would be grateful to the OD for its recent contribution to the subject because in doing so it kept it before the public and, more importantly, added to the body of public knowledge about the MVHS plan by including comments by an MVHS spokesperson that confirm that MVHS will continue to maintain a number of services and facilities at the three existing hospital locations after the new hospital is built downtown as I indicated in my letter. The spokesperson even went so far as to describe the services that will continue on the three existing MVHS campuses after the fourth is completed.

However, the fact that the spokesperson's comments were given the dignity of publication in an OD opinion is troubling. It was not just a letter to the editor from the MVHS spokesperson. It was the OD's Letters Editor revisiting my letter under the unfortunate headline "Letter Was Not Clear" and describing it as being "a bit ambiguous". That strikes me as being both odd and quite unfair, particularly in light of the fact that neither the MVHS spokesperson nor the OD contradicted anything I said. As was clearly the point of my letter, and as now confirmed by MVHS's spokesperson, three currently tax exempt medical campuses become four under the MVHS downtown plan. Not that there ever was any ambiguity or lack of clarity about that in my letter, but had there been, the OD and MVHS spokesperson have certainly cleared it up now.

Thomas P. Bonaros









March 3, 2018 Our Oneida County Historian, Joseph P. Botini, writes again, Little Minds Warp Great Ideas


February 19, 2018 I would implore all of you to not give up this fight. They are not our lords and masters! It is our tax dollars that are going to fund this monstrosity! A nurse manager, a wonderful dedicated person, I spoke with over the weekend kept repeating, "But we'll lose the $300 million if it doesn't go downtown", then lose it! Don't send good money after bad! Don't further compromise this area's healthcare! Don't further burden the remaining tax payers with pipe dreams! We can't afford it! Lois Pirro



February 18, 2018
To: editor@nohospitaldowntown.com
Subject: I Support your cause
Dear Sir or Madam:
First of all, I'd like to thank you for the efforts you've made to thwart the idea of this downtown hospital. I believe it will be a disaster for downtown Utica. I've looked over your website and I can't seem to find any references to the hospitals in Syracuse.
If you need an "in your face" reason to show people why Utica doesn't need a downtown hospital, you only need to make the one hour drive to Syracuse. Park your car in the garage off of Adams street on a Friday afternoon and walk around "hospital hill" with a video camera. Be sure to invite your local elected officials. The traffic is horrendous. Parking is difficult to come by and is extremely expensive when you do find it.
The only reason the shops and restaurants of the Marshall Street neighborhood survive is because SUNY Upstate, SUNY ESF, and Syracuse University are butted up against the hospital district. Their students (plus thousands of SU sports fans that flood the area whenever the opportunity arises) are the driving force behind the economy of that area. I highly doubt many of the businesses there could make it if only Crouse and Upstate Hospital were there to supply customers. Utica cannot even come close to that kind of customer base downtown. There are no universities drawing thousands of students there, no sports teams with anywhere near the fan base of SU, and even the AUD at full capacity is a pittance compared to the Dome.
If Syracuse is the model that Mayor Palmeri and County Executive Picente are looking to for this scheme, they are trying to compare ground beef to filet mignon. I'm not trying to put Utica down, but they are absolutely not "sister" cities from an economic or demographic perspective.
When I hear the politicians talk about economic development in Oneida County, it always sounds to me that they just want to be East-Onondaga County. They want the same things Onondaga County has, not what's best for Utica and Oneida County. They're not the same place and each has different needs and different solutions for its economic woes.
Syracuse has Hancock Airport, so then Oneida County spent millions to have "Griffiss International Airport" even though no commercial flights arrive or depart from there.
Onondaga County has Interstates 690 and 481 to get through and around Syracuse, so Oneida County spends millions on the Rt. 840 extension, which is basically an expressway running from nowhere to nowhere. They also spent millions to "upgrade" the Rt. 5-8-12 arterial so it looks a little bit more like an Interstate. How many traffic problems did that actually solve?
Syracuse has more jobs than Utica, so Oneida County spends millions on the "Nano-Utica" jobs scheme which has been a complete failure.
Now they want a Downtown hospital, just like Syracuse has! What next? Move Utica College and MVCC Downtown as well? Perhaps they'll want to pipe in water from Onondaga lake!
Maybe you should just start calling Mayor Palmeri the "Ben Walsh-wannabe" and Picente can be "Joanie Mahoney-jr." (Picente and Mahoney did both endorse Cuomo in his last election).
Oneida County was a great place to live, but schemes like this are taxing people there to the bone (a major reason I refuse to buy a house in Oneida County, despite working in it - currently living in Madison County) ... and it's only going to get worse if more people like you don't stand up to your selfish, thieving politicians and stop the drunken-sailor spending spree they seem to be on.
I hope you'll take the time to travel to Syracuse and document the headaches their downtown hospitals cause to show the folks in Utica and Oneida County what they are in for should your efforts fail.
Good luck in your fight,
Robert S.






February 7, 2018 - Many more comments of opposition regarding MVHS's newest tactic, "We're The Hospital, And We're Here To Help You", including Joseph Bottini and others. A separate page is needed to properly layout this latest news.


February 7, 2018 - Contrary to unchallenged remarks made by Mohawk Valley Health System official, Bob Scholfield, this morning on the WIBX (Bill Keeler Radio Show), experts at the United States Department of Transportation did indeed designate the proposed Utica downtown hospital site as a toxic "RED ZONE". SEE ATTACHMENT Emergency Response Guide This is the official document that establishes the 1/2 mile red/evacuation zone in the event of an oil train spill/fire.​ ​See Guide 31, page 200​ "If tank, rail car or tank truck is involved in a fire, ISOLATE for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions; also, consider initial evacuation for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions." Submitted by Frank Vescera, Utica, NY


Text Version of above Tweet: (Mr. Steve Grant, President of Landmarks Society of Greater Utica) writes, "Going back to historic home and building ownership, the proposed Downtown Hospital plan continues to worry the folks within the “footprint “ who stand to lose everything should it proceed. And more and more area taxpayers are starting to worry about the plan also as more details (or the lack of?) come to light. Conversations around town as well as the increase in the Letters To The Editor in local papers stating the people’s opposition to the plan prove that the awareness is increasing on this questionable downtown site. I should add here that the Landmarks Society does not oppose a new hospital. The Society simply feels that the downtown location would be a mistake and that the currently open acreage at the St. Lukes campus would be a far better location for a regional health center. To put it another way, the overall cost of building downtown will be devastating to both Utica’s historic downtown and Utica’s purse and pocketbook holders."







February 1, 2018 - Another statement by Oneida County Historian, Joseph P. Bottini, Downtown Hospital Truth






January 21, 2018 - Rumor has it that a billion dollar car rental corporation is renovating 525-527 Oriskany Street West - the old Labor Ready building (click for evidence of rumor). They're putting over $225,000 into the property and this will bring high paying jobs for the area, assist with City of Utica tax base and be the "first ever" global car rental agency to have presence in the City of Utica. It would be a disgrace to the City of Utica if this hospital concept continues. We valued our city and very proud of the news that a global corporation is going to be a part of it. Name Withheld







Your comment today is spot on; Cuomo is financing his entire so called economic development program with debt. It is a huge speculative gamble with our money. Although I think the hospital site is a done deal for all of the wrong reasons, the project may implode all by itself. If it does not, I predict the project will take 8 to 10 years, if finished. Many of the sick will be deprived of its medical benefits while the EDGE, lawyers and politicians prosper. Happy New Year, Rodger


Voices of 2017











Utica architect & civic leader, Mike Bosak makes his case Against Building The Hospital Downtown, as printed in December Utica Phoenix


Private citizen pokes fun at politicians seeking to take wrecking ball to Downtown Utica...



Three online comments to a Utica Observer-Dispatch story titled, Events raise questions about logic of downtown hospital...

June 14, 2017 - Hospital downtown another bad idea from bad managers. Lindsey Figueroa

June 14, 2017 - The main point I got out of the presentations was that economically it makes no sense for Utica to go from mixed-use small scale development (like what is there now and what is visioned by the Utica Master Plan) to a large scale project focused on a single use. Numerous examples were presented to demonstrate that areas that are old or even blighted actually produce more taxable value, revenue, and jobs per acre than large "big box" developments -- and that small public investments in such areas can generate huge returns. This project produces no revenue for Utica and a net LOSS of jobs, but gives the taxpayers plenty more to take care of. Additionally, mixed-use small scale developments are more resilient to changing times. The people of Utica are being asked take a huge risk that the centralized form of health-care that this project seems to represent won't fail. I have the suspicion that the push for this project comes from people who loath Utica and simply want to replace large chunks of it.Frank Montecalvo

June 14, 2017 - This City needs to consider the repercussions of a Downtown Hospital. Yes we do need to consolidate our health-care services, but that consolidation should be in a location more applicable to supporting a busy Healthcare facility The NY psychiatric center are both great location alternatives. The building are already earmarked for demolition and remediation be the State and the property would be a tremendous Hospital Campus. The infrastructure is already in place. Both NYS and MVHS should push for this unique location. Preserve Downtown for future development. Glacier Ridge


On June 14, 2017 a Downtown Utica property owner, Wilcor Co-Owner (Ms Karen Corrigan), Speaks To Oneida County Legislators.














October 4, 2017 - Peg Roberts writes to Governor Cuomo...











August 31, 2017 - Joseph Peter Drennan‎ writes to #NoHospitalDowntown and states, "Ever since I first became aware, over two years ago, of the audacious proposal of local politicians and hospital administrators to shutter..." Read entire letter

























Read this August 31, 2017 essay from Joseph Peter Drennan‎ to #NoHospitalDowntown.





Read online version of Mitchell Pedzek, Jr's Op-ed


Read "Downtowners" Do Not Want A Hospital District










Voices of 2016

November 18, 2016 - Letter to leadership from Linda K. Paciello











April 9, 2016 - A letter from a cafe owner in South Utica...

Supporters of the plan to build a hospital in downtown Utica suggest that it will lead to a great increase in foot traffic downtown and provide a major boost for small local businesses. Opponents of the plan cite research that shows that commuters to jobs in the inner city tend to drive in, park for the day and drive out keeping their business activity where they live. Research shows that the people who support downtown shops are the ones who live there or nearby in the city. As a small business owner in Utica, my experience supports the latter point of view.

My coffeehouse has been strategically located between Faxton and St. Elizabeth hospitals in Uptown for 14 years. When I opened I expected I would see a lot of hospital worker business. I have seen almost none. Hospital commuters may go through the fast-food drive-through windows but they don't walk or drive to local shops. Most probably grab their coffee at a drive through on the way to work. I expect that the downtown experience will be the same with new McDonald's and a new Dunkin' Donuts near the hospital doing very well and the small local business a few blocks away seeing no change.

I am tired of our city making development decisions based on the funding available. Isn't it time to begin to build what we need not that for which we can get a handout. Downtown needs to become walkable. People walk around in cities that have connected blocks of small shops at street level, preferably in older, funky buildings, like those in Franklin and Bagg’s Squares. We need to keep our older building intact and to develop in and around them. Put the hospital where it belongs at the current St. Luke’s campus.

Orin Domenico, Owner, Cafe Domenico

We’ve also seen amazing progress in the revitalization of our downtown. Over the past five years the city has successfully marketed and sold 12 major commercial properties to private developers, 10 of which are located in the downtown/Bagg's Square corridor. These 10 downtown properties alone have combined for over $1 million in sales, put nearly $6 million of assessed property value back on the tax rolls and cultivated over $34 million in private investment. Robert Palmieri, Mayor of Utica

Voices of 2015

October 4, 2015 - There's one important question missing that hasn't been answered: WHY does this hospital require 17 acres of building, as well as another 17 for parking in the heart of a downtown of a city of 61,332? In fact, if you look at the Attached Image I submit, none of these hospitals approach 34 acres, and most are not downtown. Utica Rising

October 4, 2015 - The monies involved should point to the Mohawk Valley. We need a hospital period! If this is a state allocation why should Utica be priority? Herkimer and Ilion closed many years ago, Little Falls is not an operational facility.... come on valley people! We need a hospital. Joyce Collea

Voices of 2014

December 31, 2014 - Hospital affiliation - The big news of 2014 in the local health care system came in March when Utica’s hospitals – Faxton St. Luke’s Healthcare and St. Elizabeth Medical Center – formally affiliated under a new parent, the Mohawk Valley Health System. The affiliation was necessary, officials said, to meet current financial and regulatory challenges; both hospitals lost money last year. So far, patients have seen few changes as a result of the affiliation, but the health system will likely consolidate at least some services in the new year. Officials have even talked about building a new hospital to replace the three current hospital buildings. Utica Observer-Dispatch

November 29, 2014 - 'Dream' of new hospital would be a nightmare - "Cash-strapped facilities have opted to renovate existing buildings to suit modern needs rather than take on the expense of new construction." Anyone who has lived in Utica for the last 50 years knows that this does not tell half the story. Renovating existing buildings has indeed been done, but the sites at St. Elizabeth and Faxton are hardly recognizable for all the new wings that have been constructed in successive stages. St. Luke's original section is less than 60 years old, and the addition of new wings to the original building over the years has been mind-boggling. Duplication? There is only one maternity center, one heart center, one cancer center. Do we really want just one emergency room for the whole area? The money for this plan will come from "$8 billion dollars in savings from Medicaid redesign." That money is not a windfall. It is the taxpayers' money that will no longer be spent in the future when the present fraud and waste have been reduced. Scott Perra needs to wake up before his dream becomes a plan. Jerome F. Weber, Utica, Utica


Downtown Utica is better without an out-of-scale hospital that bulldozes our historic urban core. #NoHospitalDowntown is "yes hospital", we simply want the new hospital at St. Luke's where they own 64-acres, and not in the Columbia Lafayette Neighborhood. Here's Why We Oppose The Downtown Utica Hospital Concept and Many Agree!



No Studies, No Reports, thus we remain #NoHospitalDowntown